Triple Z predicts Hell in a Cell and talks about how the brand split PPV's are becoming overkill to the product.
The "Triple Main Event" and The Baffling, below-average Brand Split PPV schedule.
WWE is promoting Hell in a Cell as a "Triple Main Event", and why are they doing this? So they don't receive backlash if Sasha and Charlotte don't go on last. Three Hell in a Cell matches is good. If your going to name a PPV based off of a match then you better have a lot of those type of matches at the event. Seth Rollins and Kevin Owens has been the main event feud on RAW. Sasha Banks and Charlotte's feud has been stale. WWE fans begging for "women's wrestling" and now were getting it. If WWE really was creative they would've waited until WWE TLC to do a special match with the Women. I will be optimistic about Charlotte/Banks but it's a long shot at being historic. Why was Bayley/Banks at Brooklyn historic? The reasoning is because the match was unexpectedly good. Also the feud was phenomenal at the time. There was no pressure from the audience for those two to have a good match. Then they went out and shocked the world. This match has different circumstances. Everybody is expecting this to be jaw-dropping amazing. I'll cover Sasha/Charlotte later on but maybe WWE is overexposing the product?
WWE doing a PPV event once every two weeks is crazy. If your a wrestling fan that doesn't have anything else going on then "It's absolutely great!" Although the product seems rushed and the pay-per-views seem watered down. WWE is starting to not care about the story of it all. WWE is more concerned with content. WWE's PPV schedule has been hard to follow. Maybe WWE turns it around for the "Road to WrestleMania", or do they continue on this overexposed path?
I created ZWrestleTalk. On this page I give my PPV predictions for Wrestling Events (Usually just WWE)